Prediction of Tessa Price vs Emanuela Zardo Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Price vs E. Zardo

Tessa Price

RSA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

101

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Emanuela Zardo

SUI

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

101

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Price 1 - 1 Zardo

They have played 4 sets in total, with Tessa Price winning 2 and Emanuela Zardo winning 2. The last match between Tessa Price and Emanuela Zardo was at the Auckland, 31-01-1994, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Tessa Price getting the victory 7-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Price	1
Zardo	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R4) Auckland(01-31-94)

Stats

Tessa Price

Emanuela Zardo

(R3) Hobart(01-10-94)

Stats

Emanuela Zardo

Tessa Price

T. Price vs E. Zardo H2H Profile

T. Price	Stats	E. Zardo
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
61.47% (134-84)	Career Total W/L	57.34% (203-151)
1	Hard	1
9	Titles	7
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Price vs E. Zardo Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tessa Price has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Emanuela Zardo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tessa Price, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emanuela Zardo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tessa Price has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emanuela Zardo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tessa Price has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Emanuela Zardo winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tessa Price has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 98/53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/7). Emanuela Zardo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 158/95), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 44% (W/L 12/15).
Player level: In the last year, Tessa Price has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Emanuela Zardo has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tessa Price winning 1 times and Emanuela Zardo being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tessa Price winning 2 and Emanuela Zardo winning 2.
The last match between Tessa Price and Emanuela Zardo was at the Auckland, 31-01-1994, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Tessa Price getting the victory 7-6 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tessa Price has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Emanuela Zardo has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tessa Price has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emanuela Zardo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tessa Price has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emanuela Zardo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tessa Price vs Emanuela Zardo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Price vs E. Zardo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Price	Stats	E. Zardo
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
19	Games Won	22
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Price Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1996
Q1 Tara SnyderT. Snyder	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Eastbourne - 18-06-1996
Q1 Meghann ShaughnessyM. Shaughnessy	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Birmingham - 10-06-1996
Q1 Nicole PrattN. Pratt	L	6-4 4-2 RET	Stats
Guimaraes 10K - 30-04-1996
SF Kristina TriskaK. Triska	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R3 Julia Carballal FernandezJ. Carballal	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

E. Zardo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Salzburg 25K - 09-12-1996
R3 Mirjana LucicM. Lucic	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Cergy Pontoise 50K - 02-12-1996
R3 Caroline DheninC. Dhenin	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Ramat Hasharon 25K - 04-11-1996
R3 Olga BarabanschikovaO. Barabanschikova	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Edinburgh 25K - 28-10-1996
F Denisa ChladkovaD. Chladkova	L	7-6 6-0	Stats
R4 Patty Van AckerP. Van	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

T. Price vs E. Zardo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Price	Stats	E. Zardo
61.47% (134/84)	YTD Win/Loss	57.34% (203/151)
60.12% (303/201)	Sets Win/Loss	55.77% (440/349)
55.03% (2502/2045)	Games Win/Loss	52.88% (3764/3354)
64.90% (98/53)	Hard Win/Loss	44.68% (21/26)
36.36% (4/7)	Clay Win/Loss	62.45% (158/95)
64.29% (9/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.44% (12/15)
54.17% (13/11)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
421.64	Average Opponent Rank	328.19
25.00% (1/3)	Slam W/L	38.89% (7/11)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	52.63% (10/9)
71.32% (97/39)	Challenger W/L	71.21% (94/38)
55.56% (10/8)	Futures W/L	33.33% (6/12)
62% (133/216)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (201/350)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
52% (11/21)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (12/21)
48% (33/69)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (50/87)
90% (125/112)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (199/176)
10% (125/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (199/23)
23% (92/21)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (153/26)